radc eNTERPRISES

We have filed a potential class action lawsuit against the gas station operator RADC Enterprises, Inc. (“RADC”) for wage and hour violations. We have requested RADC to provide the authorized time and payroll records of current and former employees, but RADC is currently not complying with this request.

We are currently looking to add an employee who worked for RADC Enterprises, Inc. in 2022 or earlier as a new plaintiff for this case. If you worked for RADC Enterprises, Inc. during this period, or worked after 2023 and would like to discuss your experience, our attorneys would like to speak with you. Please call us at 213.612.0988.

NORMAL LIFE OF CALIFORNIA

We have filed a potential class action lawsuit against the senior care center, Normal Life of California for wage and hour violations. We would like to speak with witnesses who may have information about the claims in our case, namely, specific pay codes identified on paystubs as RET pay and CA Split pay. If you are a current or former employee of Normal Life, and would like further information on both the current case status and how to assist us in building this case, please call us at 213.612.0988.

BOEING COMPANY

July 11,2024: Los Angeles Superior Court granted class certification for all non-union current and former hourly-paid or non-exempt employees who worked a 9/80 alternative workweek schedule within the State of California between April 3, 2015 to the present. Jury trial is scheduled to begin on February 2, 2026.

Further information on the case and class certified subclasses can be found at www.yoonlaw.com/boeing. Please continue to watch this site or call for updates.

geoguidance

October 24, 2024: Kern County Superior Court granted Plaintiff’s Final Approval of Class Action Settlement.

Payments are expected to be sent out by early 2026. More information on the case can be at www.yoonlaw.com/geoguidance. Please continue to watch this site or call for updates.

Wal-mart

April 12, 2019: Jury returns verdict in favor of plaintiffs’ claims regarding meal breaks.

February 11, 2020: The Court denied all post-trial motions.

May 14, 2021: Both sides filed appeals. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held oral argument on this date. A link to the recording is here.

June 30, 2022: In an unpublished memorandum, the 9th Circuit upheld the plaintiffs’ jury verdict. A link to the decision is here. In a published opinion, the 9th Circuit allowed the plaintiffs to proceed on the PAGA claims. A link to the decision is here. We are continuing to seek more money for the workers at the Chino warehouse under the revived Private Attorneys’ General Act claim.

July 29, 2024: On this date, the court stayed the case. A stay is a ruling by a court to stop or suspend a proceeding or trial temporarily or indefinitely. The case is still stayed. Please continue to watch this site or call for updates.